48hours working week in Britain
- :FI:Macca
- The North Pole
- Posts: 3012
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 10:55 am
- Location: Solar System
- Contact:
48hours working week in Britain
Folks,
As part of my studies we have a simulation of a debate of the Council of Europe regarding the argument over the changes in the lenght of the working week. Together with a friend of mine we were given the task of representing the UK and to defend the 48 hours working week. Others will try to persuade us to lower it... Could somebody give me reasonable reasons for keeping it like that and not lowering it to ,say, 38?
I know that more work hours means bigger productivity (theoretically), so lets say that this might have influence on the height of gross domestic product. Of course - reasons don't have to be economic only. Offices lpen longer?
Any clues?
Would appreciate any help.
Mac
As part of my studies we have a simulation of a debate of the Council of Europe regarding the argument over the changes in the lenght of the working week. Together with a friend of mine we were given the task of representing the UK and to defend the 48 hours working week. Others will try to persuade us to lower it... Could somebody give me reasonable reasons for keeping it like that and not lowering it to ,say, 38?
I know that more work hours means bigger productivity (theoretically), so lets say that this might have influence on the height of gross domestic product. Of course - reasons don't have to be economic only. Offices lpen longer?
Any clues?
Would appreciate any help.
Mac



- :FI:Sneaky_Russian
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: London SE. Untied Kingdom
- Contact:
Or they could lower it to 24 hrs and have full employment + overtime for all.
- but don't start me on a rant here.
Somewhere at the root of this is a failure of successive governments over the past 40 years to maintain a successful housing policy and the subsequent over inflated housing costs that have been the result.
A shorter work week would mean less time for "skiving" .
See definition of skiving
- but don't start me on a rant here.
Somewhere at the root of this is a failure of successive governments over the past 40 years to maintain a successful housing policy and the subsequent over inflated housing costs that have been the result.
A shorter work week would mean less time for "skiving" .
See definition of skiving


"The marksman hitteth the target partly by pulling, partly by letting go. The boatsman reacheth the landing partly by pulling, partly by letting go." (Egyptian proverb)
- AltarBoy
- Post Maniac 1st Grade
- Posts: 1808
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2006 11:07 pm
- Location: Falcon's Next Door Neighbour!
We have a 40-hr work week over here. But the Unions will probably have a field day with that one. You have to take into account the stresses at work and the impact of extra hours and how it affects productivity (sick leave, etc). A company may find it non-productive in cost of medicals to its employees. An example, our airport security used to work 12-hr shifts. The union made application to ICAO complaining that an officer cannot function effectively past 8 hours. So it depends on the type of job.
On a side note my boss's contract ended, now I have no boss, that means I get away with murder! Now where are those flight attendants.

On a side note my boss's contract ended, now I have no boss, that means I get away with murder! Now where are those flight attendants.


- :FI:Sneaky_Russian
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: London SE. Untied Kingdom
- Contact:
- :FI:Macca
- The North Pole
- Posts: 3012
- Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2003 10:55 am
- Location: Solar System
- Contact:
Thx AB. So imagine me as a British official defending the idea o 48 hr. What shall I say?
I can tell that productivity is bigger, but others will say that tired worker sucks at work. Well,depending on a job, sometimes this is better...
anyway, longer working hours mean that more buisnesses work longer during theday ( so obvius...im tired) and are longer avaliable for people....
stupid debate lol
I can tell that productivity is bigger, but others will say that tired worker sucks at work. Well,depending on a job, sometimes this is better...
anyway, longer working hours mean that more buisnesses work longer during theday ( so obvius...im tired) and are longer avaliable for people....
stupid debate lol



- :FI:Sneaky_Russian
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: London SE. Untied Kingdom
- Contact:
Another thought is that when we were doing a refurbish at a curry house ; they wanted as little down time on the business as possible. We stayed on site (accommodation provided) and worked through most of the time.
Not sure how legislation affects self employed.
HGV and PSV drivers have always had their hours limited since the 50's at least.
Not sure how legislation affects self employed.
HGV and PSV drivers have always had their hours limited since the 50's at least.

"The marksman hitteth the target partly by pulling, partly by letting go. The boatsman reacheth the landing partly by pulling, partly by letting go." (Egyptian proverb)
- :FI:Sneaky_Russian
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: London SE. Untied Kingdom
- Contact:
- :FI:Airway
- Post Maniac 3rd Grade
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2007 11:29 am
- Location: Germany
- :FI:Sneaky_Russian
- Post Maniac General
- Posts: 3118
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 4:02 am
- Location: London SE. Untied Kingdom
- Contact: