re:9/11 - WTC 7
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 9:38 am
I still find this report disturbing :-
Other Evidences
These are not the only evidences for demolition, but are submitted as additional evidences in an already lengthy list of evidences that point to demolition from pre-positioned explosives, which point to this having been an inside job being covered up by the present administration.
Additional evidences are presented amply elsewhere. In brief, a summary is as follows:
The engineers who designed the building designed it to withstand impact by planes and fire.
Building 7, which was not structurally damaged by aircraft, came down in a manner that matches the signature demolition model, complete with triggering squibs (outward explosions of support structures preceding the falling mass), and falling into its footprint. Slow motion video footage highlights these features.
Towers 1 and 2 also fell in a manner consistent with demolition, and had numerous visible squibs preceding the falling mass. Bear in mind that a "tidy" and "safe" fall would not necessarily be the objective of individuals pulling off such a thing.
Rate of speed of the fall is near that of free-fall, which contradicts the pancake model in which a delay must be expected due to conservation of momentum – one of the foundational Laws of Physics.
The fine powder into which the building was converted during the collapse is consistent with the demolition model and its associated explosives. There would have been some pulverization in the pancake model, but not to the extent seen in this case.
Molten iron in the wreckage, weeks after the collapse, is consistent with military-grade demolition charges, which chemicals continue to react with the metal long after the initial implosion event.
Numerous eyewitnesses described hearing explosions not associated with the planes hitting the buildings.
The wreckage from the towers was quickly shipped off for scrap, contrary to laws governing removal of items from a crime scene.
WTC buildings 1,2 and 7 had undergone unannounced security evacuations in the days prior to Sept. 11. A concurrent power outage disabled security cameras. Explosives-sniffing dogs were called off as part of that evacuation procedure. Martin Bush, brother to the President, was involved with the security company involved in this process.
It would take 10 men ten trips to place the necessary explosives to bring the towers down by demolition.
The 911 Commission report says that there were no central support columns, which is a lie. The WTC had the most robust central support columns in the world at the time it was built, and was designed to be centrally supported.